Delegitimising JK Rowling

My name is Pat Riarchy and I am a woman. I define myself as such, and that is enough. In the words of the great philosopher Descartes, “I think, therefore I am.” I am sure he would agree that because I think I’m a woman, I am one.

Delegitimising JK Rowling

My name is Pat Riarchy and I am a woman.

I define myself as such, and that is enough.

In the words of the great philosopher Descartes, “I think, therefore I am.”

I am sure he would agree that because I think I’m a woman, I am one.

As I often say: if I put an egg on a Croque Monsieur, no one objects that it becomes a Croque Madame. So why is putting a wig on a man any different? No transphobe can answer that.

There is, however, one prominent individual who denies my identity and has single-handedly fuelled a global movement of hatred:

J. K. Rowling.

A woman who would be virtually unknown were it not for her need to generate attention through inflammatory remarks.

Pat Riarchy is a woman. She tells us she is and as he backs up her argument with flawless philosophical reasoning, which she sets out in her forthcoming book ‘I think I’m a woman, therefore I am: how philosophy defeats transphobia’.

Sign up to the OMS newsletter

Stay informed with the latest news from the most important department in the country.

Thank you for signing up.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription.

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.